Skip to main content

Financial Services and General Government (114th Congress)

Membership

Rep. Mike Quigley, Ranking Member

Rep. José Serrano

Rep. Matt Cartwright

Rep. Sanford Bishop

 

Jurisdiction

Department of the Treasury

District of Columbia

The Judiciary

Executive Office of the President

Compensation of the President 

Council of Economic Advisers 

Executive Residence at the White House 

Federal Drug Control Programs 

High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program 

National Security Council

Office of Administration 

Office of Management and Budget 

Office of National Drug Control Policy 

Office of Policy Development 

Official Residence of the Vice President 

Special Assistance to the President 

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

Unanticipated Needs 

White House Office 

White House Repair and Restoration

Independent Agencies

Administrative Conference of the United States 

Christopher Columbus Fellowship Foundation 

Consumer Product Safety Commission 

Election Assistance Commission 

Federal Communications Commission 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of Inspector General 

Federal Election Commission 

Federal Labor Relations Authority 

Federal Trade Commission 

General Services Administration 

Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation 

Merit Systems Protection Board 

Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental Policy Foundation 

National Archives and Records Administration 

National Credit Union Administration 

National Historical Publications and Records Commission 

Office of Government Ethics 

Office of Personnel Management and Related Trust Funds 

Office of Special Counsel

Securities and Exchange Commission 

Selective Service System 

Small Business Administration 

United States Postal Service, Payment to the Postal Service Fund, Postal Regulatory Commission and Office of Inspector General

United States Tax Court

General Provisions, Governmentwide

Recent Activity
Displaying 6 - 8 of 8

The 2016 Financial Services & General Government Appropriations bill is merely a vehicle for accomplishing the most extreme policy priorities of the Republican majority. It would undermine key elements of the Affordable Care Act and Dodd-Frank financial reform, diminish women's access to legal health services, meddle in the District of Columbia's internal affairs, undermine the President's Cuba policy, and prevent fair treatment of internet content to benefit the interests of a few large corporations. The bill rewards tax cheats – not honest hardworking Americans – by failing to provide sufficient funding to enforce tax law and assist taxpayers.

Highlights of 2016 Financial Services & General Government Appropriations bill:

2015 enacted: $21.57 billion

2016 President's request: $25.05 billion

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Let me begin by thanking you for the way you have conducted this subcommittee. You have been fair with our side throughout this year's appropriations process, and although there are lots of things here that we don't agree on, you have always sought out our opinion and attempted to find the middle ground where it was available.

I also want to thank the staff on both sides of the aisle for all the hours they have put into creating this bill and report. We are all thankful for the time and energy they have put into this endeavor.

Thank you Mr. Chairman. I would also like to welcome Internal Revenue Service Commissioner John Koskinen back before the subcommittee.

We are here today at a very serious time for the Internal Revenue Service. Last year, the IRS budget was cut by $346 million dollars, leaving the agency at the lowest level of funding since fiscal year 2008. Since fiscal year 2010, the IRS has been cut by more than $1.2 billion. And if some in the other party had had their way, they would have been cut even further.

The results of these cuts are predictable. Is it a surprise to anyone that the IRS telephone response rates have plummeted? Is it news to anyone that the IRS is unlikely to collect as many taxes when we reduce their funding in such a ham-handed way?