Skip to main content

Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies (113th Congress)

[[{"fid":"64","view_mode":"full","fields":{"format":"full","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":"Rep. Marcy Kaptur","field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":"Rep. Marcy Kaptur"},"type":"media","field_deltas":{"1":{"format":"full","field_file_image_alt_text[und][0][value]":"Rep. Marcy Kaptur","field_file_image_title_text[und][0][value]":"Rep. Marcy Kaptur"}},"link_text":null,"attributes":{"alt":"Rep. Marcy Kaptur","title":"Rep. Marcy Kaptur","height":"320","width":"205","style":"float: left;","class":"media-element file-full","data-delta":"1"}}]]Marcy Kaptur (OH), Ranking Member

Pete Visclosky (IN)

Mike Honda (CA)

Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jurisdiction

Department of Energy

Department of Defense-Civil; Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers-Civil

Department of the Interior; Bureau of Reclamation; Central Utah Project

Related Agencies

Appalachian Regional Commission 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

Delta Regional Authority

Denali Commission 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board 

Tennessee Valley Authority

Recent Activity
Displaying 11 - 15 of 24

Good afternoon. Dr. Moniz, it is good to see you again and welcome to your first appearance before the Subcommittee.

Mr. Secretary, the early reviews on your tenure as Secretary have been good from most, if not all, quarters but I believe the hardest challenges lie before you.

I have long sited our reliance on foreign energy as a grave economic and national security concern—over the last decade, we have spent $2.3 trillion importing foreign oil, making rich some of the worst global players at the expense of our own citizens.

2013 enacted level (excluding Sandy reconstruction): $33.2 billion

2014 Committee mark: $30.4 billion

2014 Omnibus: $34.1 billion

· $1.912 billion for Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, which is $102 million more than the 2013 enacted level.

· $5.071 billion for the Department of Energy Office of Science, which is $205 million more than the 2013 enacted level.

· $280 million for the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E), which is $15.5 million more than the 2013 enacted level.

· $5.8 billion for environmental cleanup activities, which is $111 million more than the 2013 enacted level.

Unfortunately, the Subcommittee's allocation results in a bill that continues the dramatic underinvestment in our nation's waterways, infrastructure, energy efficiency, and scientists.
Unfortunately, the overall allocation is simply too small to adequately address the needs of our nation. I am afraid that the severe cuts to key programs will stifle American competitiveness.
This bill would slash funding for applied energy research and development, even as foreign competitors double down to develop twenty-first century technology and undermine our markets through illegal dumping and intellectual property poaching.